R v Jason Robert NAA [2009] NSWSC 1077

R v Jason Robert NAA [2009] NSWSC 1077

While the offender suffered from depression and a brain injury reducing his ability to control himself under the influence of alcohol, he was aware of his actions and intended to kill the deceased. The mental impairment, while relevant, only slightly reduces the seriousness of the offence and his culpability. Thus, the appropriate sentence for murder is below the midrange for objective seriousness. Associated offences are sentenced concurrently or with short, fixed terms in light of overall criminality.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
09 October 2009
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing After Conviction by Jury
Outcome
On charge of murder, offender sentenced to 23 years' custody with a non-parole period of 17 years 3 months; on charge of assault occasioning actual bodily harm, fixed term of 22 months (expired); on charge of using offensive weapon, fixed term of 3 years 3 months (to expire 19 January 2011).
Legal Topics
['murder' 'assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm' 'use of Offensive Weapon' 'sentencing' 'substantial Impairment' 'mental Health and Sentencing' 'domestic Violence']
['criminal Law'] ['murder' 'assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm' 'use of Offensive Weapon' 'sentencing' 'substantial Impairment' 'mental Health and Sentencing' 'domestic Violence']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing After Conviction by Jury

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Appropriate sentence for conviction of murder where jury rejected defence of substantial impairment' "Relevance of offender's mental health and intoxication on sentence" 'Relative seriousness of the offence compared to similar cases' 'Appropriate sentences for associated offences (assault occasioning actual bodily harm, use of offensive weapon)']

Ratio Decidendi

While the offender suffered from depression and a brain injury reducing his ability to control himself under the influence of alcohol, he was aware of his actions and intended to kill the deceased. The mental impairment, while relevant, only slightly reduces the seriousness of the offence and his culpability. Thus, the appropriate sentence for murder is below the midrange for objective seriousness. Associated offences are sentenced concurrently or with short, fixed terms in light of overall criminality.

Court Disposition

On charge of murder, offender sentenced to 23 years' custody with a non-parole period of 17 years 3 months; on charge of assault occasioning actual bodily harm, fixed term of 22 months (expired); on charge of using offensive weapon, fixed term of 3 years 3 months (to expire 19 January 2011).

Orders

  • ['On charge of murder: total period of custody of 23 years, non-parole period of 17 years 3 months, balance of term 5 years 9 months, sentence dates from 20 October 2007, non-parole period expires on 19 January 2025.' 'On charge of assault occasioning actual bodily harm: fixed term of 22 months from 20 October 2007,...