R v TABER; R v STYMAN; R v STYMAN [2003] NSWSC 93

R v TABER; R v STYMAN; R v STYMAN [2003] NSWSC 93

The principal offenders, Peter David Taber and Ian Craig Styman, were found guilty of aggravated robbery and murder of Joy Golbie Alchin as their actions in binding, gagging, and abandoning her, coupled with the failure to secure her rescue, directly caused her death and demonstrated reckless indifference to human life. Shannon Troy Styman was found guilty of manslaughter and aggravated robbery, his actions being criminally negligent and unlawful, though his role was more subordinate and he expressed remorse. Sentences imposed reflected the extreme seriousness and planning of the crimes, the absence of significant mitigating factors for Taber and Ian Styman, and some mitigation for...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 February 2003
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Outcome
Guilty. Sentences of imprisonment imposed for all offenders on all counts.
Legal Topics
['murder' 'manslaughter' 'aggravated Robbery' 'sentencing' 'breaking and Entering' 'criminal Negligence']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentence

  1. 1 ['Whether offenders were guilty of murder or manslaughter for the death of Joy Golbie Alchin' 'Appropriateness of sentencing for aggravated robbery and associated homicide charges' 'Consideration of the role and culpability of each offender']

Ratio Decidendi

The principal offenders, Peter David Taber and Ian Craig Styman, were found guilty of aggravated robbery and murder of Joy Golbie Alchin as their actions in binding, gagging, and abandoning her, coupled with the failure to secure her rescue, directly caused her death and demonstrated reckless indifference to human life. Shannon Troy Styman was found guilty of manslaughter and aggravated robbery, his actions being criminally negligent and unlawful, though his role was more subordinate and he expressed remorse. Sentences imposed reflected the extreme seriousness and planning of the crimes, the absence of significant mitigating factors for Taber and Ian Styman, and some mitigation for...

Court Disposition

Guilty. Sentences of imprisonment imposed for all offenders on all counts.

Orders

  • ["Peter David Taber sentenced to 20 years' imprisonment for aggravated robbery, commencing 26 March 2001, no non-parole period; sentenced to life imprisonment for murder, commencing 26 March 2003." "Ian Craig Styman sentenced to 20 years' imprisonment for aggravated robbery, commencing 26 March 2001, no non-parole...