Regina v Wilkinson [2004] NSWSC 1307

Regina v Wilkinson [2004] NSWSC 1307

The murder was a premeditated killing for financial reward in which the offender willingly played a substantial part by recruiting and driving the shooter, and her criminality was very high despite reduced culpability arising from manipulation, vulnerability and mental state. A sentence of 30 years would otherwise have been warranted, but the plea of guilty and contrition justified reduction to 22½ years with a non-parole period of 16½ years.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 May 2004
Procedural Posture
Criminal Law Sentence for Murder / Remarks on Sentence After Guilty Plea
Outcome
The offender was convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for 22½ years with a non-parole period of 16½ years.
Legal Topics
['murder' 'joint Criminal Enterprise' 'premeditated Killing for Financial Reward' 'guilty Plea' 'contrition' 'general Deterrence' 'non Parole Period']
['criminal Law' 'sentencing'] ['murder' 'joint Criminal Enterprise' 'premeditated Killing for Financial Reward' 'guilty Plea' 'contrition' 'general Deterrence' 'non Parole Period']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Law Sentence for Murder / Remarks on Sentence After Guilty Plea

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["What sentence should be imposed for the offender's conviction for murder." "How the offender's role in a premeditated killing for financial reward should affect culpability where she was part of a joint enterprise but did not fire the fatal shot." "Whether the offender's vulnerability, drug use and possible hypomanic state reduced her criminality." 'What allowance should be made for the guilty plea and contrition.' 'Whether special circumstances warranted a parole period different from the statutory proportion.']

Ratio Decidendi

The murder was a premeditated killing for financial reward in which the offender willingly played a substantial part by recruiting and driving the shooter, and her criminality was very high despite reduced culpability arising from manipulation, vulnerability and mental state. A sentence of 30 years would otherwise have been warranted, but the plea of guilty and contrition justified reduction to 22½ years with a non-parole period of 16½ years.

Court Disposition

The offender was convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for 22½ years with a non-parole period of 16½ years.

Orders

  • ['The offender is convicted.' 'The offender is sentenced to a term of imprisonment for 22½ years.' 'A non-parole period of imprisonment for 16½ years is set.' 'The sentence is to commence on 3 March 2003 and expire on 2 September 2019.' 'The balance of the term of the sentence is imprisonment for 6 years to date...