Regina v PHAN [2000] NSWSC 426
The murder was an objectively serious shooting, and although the prisoner was young, had a difficult refugee background, limited English, minor antecedents, and some prospects for rehabilitation, he had not pleaded guilty or shown remorse. Balancing those factors and allowing for 17 weeks of custody, the Court imposed a substantial term of imprisonment with a non-parole period, but did not impose a life sentence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 May 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Prosecution for Murder / Sentence After Jury Verdict of Guilty
- Outcome
- Sentence imposed for murder.
- Legal Topics
- ['murder' 'imprisonment' 'non Parole Period' 'youth of Offender' 'pre Trial Custody']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution for Murder / Sentence After Jury Verdict of Guilty
Legal Issues
- 1 ["What sentence should be imposed for the prisoner's conviction for murder." 'Whether the objective seriousness of the murder required a substantial sentence of imprisonment.' "What weight should be given to the prisoner's youth, background, limited English, antecedents, and absence of remorse or guilty plea." 'How pre-trial custody should be reflected in the head sentence and non-parole period.']
Ratio Decidendi
The murder was an objectively serious shooting, and although the prisoner was young, had a difficult refugee background, limited English, minor antecedents, and some prospects for rehabilitation, he had not pleaded guilty or shown remorse. Balancing those factors and allowing for 17 weeks of custody, the Court imposed a substantial term of imprisonment with a non-parole period, but did not impose a life sentence.
Court Disposition
Sentence imposed for murder.
Orders
- ['The prisoner is sentenced to imprisonment for a term of 13 years and 35 weeks, commencing 26 May 2000.' 'The non-parole period is 10 years and 9 weeks, commencing 26 May 2000.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment