R v George Tannous [2016] NSWSC 330
The evidence overwhelmingly established that at the time the accused committed the fatal act, he was suffering from a delusional disorder that deprived him of the capacity to reason about the moral wrongfulness of his actions; accordingly, the only appropriate verdict was not guilty by reason of mental illness.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 March 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judge Alone Trial, Verdict and Ancillary Orders
- Outcome
- Not guilty by reason of mental illness; orders made regarding detention and notification of authorities.
- Legal Topics
- ['murder' 'mental Illness Defence' 'special Verdict']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judge Alone Trial, Verdict and Ancillary Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the accused was not guilty of murder by reason of mental illness in accordance with s 38 of the Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990.']
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence overwhelmingly established that at the time the accused committed the fatal act, he was suffering from a delusional disorder that deprived him of the capacity to reason about the moral wrongfulness of his actions; accordingly, the only appropriate verdict was not guilty by reason of mental illness.
Court Disposition
Not guilty by reason of mental illness; orders made regarding detention and notification of authorities.
Orders
- ['The accused George Tannous is found not guilty of murder by reason of mental illness.' 'He is ordered to be detained at the MRRC or at such other place as determined by the Mental Health Review Tribunal until released by due process of law.' 'Registrar directed to notify the Minister for Health of the judgment and...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment