R v Dawson [2022] NSWSC 861
There was no impropriety in the way the Family Court documents were obtained, the Harman principle does not prevent their admission as they were received into evidence in prior proceedings, and their use by the Crown is not unfair to the accused. Therefore, the documents are admissible.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 July 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Procedural Ruling During Murder Trial
- Outcome
- Application to exclude documents dismissed; documents admitted as Exhibit CU.
- Legal Topics
- ['murder' 'admissibility of Evidence' 'improperly Obtained Evidence' 'harman Principle' 'unfairness of Admissions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Procedural Ruling During Murder Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Family Court documents relied on by the Crown are inadmissible under s 138 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) for being improperly obtained or as a consequence of impropriety' 'Whether tender of the Family Court documents breaches the Harman principle' 'Whether the use of admissions in the documents by the Crown would be unfair to the accused and should be excluded under s 90 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)']
Ratio Decidendi
There was no impropriety in the way the Family Court documents were obtained, the Harman principle does not prevent their admission as they were received into evidence in prior proceedings, and their use by the Crown is not unfair to the accused. Therefore, the documents are admissible.
Court Disposition
Application to exclude documents dismissed; documents admitted as Exhibit CU.
Orders
- ['Admit the documents from the Family Court as Exhibit CU.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment