R v Wang [2015] NSWSC 433
A sentence of imprisonment for 20 years, with a non-parole period of 15 years, was appropriate having regard to the gravity of the murder, the loss of control, the offender’s deep remorse, the utilitarian value of the guilty plea, prior good character, and the circumstances in mitigation; but not so as to depart from the statutory ratio between total sentence and non-parole period.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 April 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence / Sentencing After Plea of Guilty
- Outcome
- Offender sentenced to imprisonment for 20 years from 25 February 2013, expiring 24 February 2033, with a non-parole period of 15 years; eligible for parole 24 February 2028.
- Legal Topics
- ['murder' 'sentencing' 'plea of Guilty' 'loss of Control' 'remorse' 'character Evidence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence / Sentencing After Plea of Guilty
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What is the appropriate sentence for a plea of guilty to murder in the described circumstances?' 'How do mitigating and aggravating circumstances affect sentencing for murder?']
Ratio Decidendi
A sentence of imprisonment for 20 years, with a non-parole period of 15 years, was appropriate having regard to the gravity of the murder, the loss of control, the offender’s deep remorse, the utilitarian value of the guilty plea, prior good character, and the circumstances in mitigation; but not so as to depart from the statutory ratio between total sentence and non-parole period.
Court Disposition
Offender sentenced to imprisonment for 20 years from 25 February 2013, expiring 24 February 2033, with a non-parole period of 15 years; eligible for parole 24 February 2028.
Orders
- ['Convicted of murder.' 'Sentenced to 20 years imprisonment from 25 February 2013 to 24 February 2033.' 'Non-parole period of 15 years.' 'First eligible for parole on 24 February 2028.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment