R v DURANT [2007] NSWSC 428

R v DURANT [2007] NSWSC 428

The murder was intentional but below the middle of the range of objective seriousness because there was no significant premeditation, the Prisoner acted under a delusional belief connected to prior childhood abuse and abnormality of mind that substantially impaired her ability to judge right from wrong, and her background contributed to her condition and drug use. However, the offence was committed while on conditional liberty, drugs were a major contributing cause, her prospects of rehabilitation were only reasonable, and special circumstances were not established. A non-parole period of 13 years and 6 months with a further term of 4 years and 5 months was the lowest appropriate sentence.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 April 2007
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing for Murder / Sentence After Jury Conviction
Outcome
Prisoner sentenced to imprisonment for murder.
Legal Topics
['murder' 'non Parole Period' 'standard Non Parole Period' 'substantial Impairment by Abnormality of Mind' 'drug Addiction and Intoxication' 'aggravating and Mitigating Factors' 'special Circumstances']
['criminal Law' 'sentencing'] ['murder' 'non Parole Period' 'standard Non Parole Period' 'substantial Impairment by Abnormality of Mind' 'drug Addiction and Intoxication' 'aggravating and Mitigating Factors' 'special Circumstances']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sentencing for Murder / Sentence After Jury Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["What sentence should be imposed for the Prisoner's murder conviction." 'Whether the offence fell above, at, or below the middle of the range of objective seriousness for murder.' 'The extent to which abnormality of mind, delusional belief, drug use, childhood abuse and neglect, remorse, rehabilitation prospects, and conditional liberty affected sentence.' 'Whether special circumstances justified altering the statutory ratio between the non-parole period and balance of term.']

Ratio Decidendi

The murder was intentional but below the middle of the range of objective seriousness because there was no significant premeditation, the Prisoner acted under a delusional belief connected to prior childhood abuse and abnormality of mind that substantially impaired her ability to judge right from wrong, and her background contributed to her condition and drug use. However, the offence was committed while on conditional liberty, drugs were a major contributing cause, her prospects of rehabilitation were only reasonable, and special circumstances were not established. A non-parole period of 13 years and 6 months with a further term of 4 years and 5 months was the lowest appropriate sentence.

Court Disposition

Prisoner sentenced to imprisonment for murder.

Orders

  • ['The Prisoner is sentenced to imprisonment for a non-parole period of 13 years and 6 months commencing on 19 January 2005.' 'The Prisoner is sentenced to a further term of 4 years and 5 months.' 'The date upon which it appears that the Prisoner will become eligible for parole is recorded as 19 July 2018.']