Regina v Crespin Adanguidi [2005] NSWSC 519

Regina v Crespin Adanguidi [2005] NSWSC 519

Although the offender was suffering from a developing illness, the Court was not satisfied that it affected his ability to judge right from wrong, reason about the moral wrongness of his acts, understand events or control himself. The murders were carefully prepared, committed out of greed, and involved extreme culpability, so the community interest in retribution, punishment, community protection and deterrence could only be met by imposing life imprisonment for each murder.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 June 2005
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing for Murder / Sentence After Jury Verdicts of Guilty
Outcome
The offender was sentenced to imprisonment for life for each of the three murders, each sentence taken to have commenced on 1 February 2003.
Legal Topics
['murder' 'life Imprisonment' 'mandatory Life Sentence' 'mental Illness Defence' 'substantial Impairment by Abnormality of Mind' 'culpability']
['criminal Law' 'sentencing'] ['murder' 'life Imprisonment' 'mandatory Life Sentence' 'mental Illness Defence' 'substantial Impairment by Abnormality of Mind' 'culpability']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sentencing for Murder / Sentence After Jury Verdicts of Guilty

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the offender was suffering from mental illness or any abnormality of mind when he murdered Shiquin Zhu, Pin Shen and Christy Bo Shen.' "Whether any developing illness affected the offender's ability to judge right from wrong, reason about the moral wrongness of his acts, understand events or control himself." 'Whether the level of culpability in the commission of the murders was so extreme that the community interest in retribution, punishment, community protection and deterrence could only be met by life imprisonment.']

Ratio Decidendi

Although the offender was suffering from a developing illness, the Court was not satisfied that it affected his ability to judge right from wrong, reason about the moral wrongness of his acts, understand events or control himself. The murders were carefully prepared, committed out of greed, and involved extreme culpability, so the community interest in retribution, punishment, community protection and deterrence could only be met by imposing life imprisonment for each murder.

Court Disposition

The offender was sentenced to imprisonment for life for each of the three murders, each sentence taken to have commenced on 1 February 2003.

Orders

  • ['For the murder of Shiquin Zhu the offender is sentenced to imprisonment for life. The sentence will be taken to have commenced on 1 February 2003.' 'For the murder of Pin Shen the offender is sentenced to imprisonment for life. The sentence will be taken to have commenced on 1 February 2003.' 'For the murder of...