R v RISI [2022] NSWSC 862
The Court accepted Ms Thornton's account despite the defence criticisms and was satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the accused struck Mr Weller in the head at least once with the white electric guitar, causing fatal traumatic brain injury, and struck Ms Thornton in the leg causing actual bodily harm. On the expert psychiatric evidence of Dr Allnutt and Dr Furst and the broader evidence of the accused's mental state, the Court was satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the accused had a mental health impairment and a cognitive impairment which caused a delusional belief that Ms Thornton was in danger and needed his help, so that he did not know his acts were morally wrong. The...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 July 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Special Hearing for Murder and Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm / Judge Alone Special Hearing After Findings That the Accused Was Unfit to Be Tried and Would Not Become Fit Within 12 Months
- Outcome
- Offences proven but the accused not criminally responsible for them.
- Legal Topics
- ['murder' 'assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm' 'special Hearing' 'unfitness to Be Tried' 'defence of Mental Health Impairment or Cognitive Impairment' 'special Verdict of Act Proven But Not Criminally Responsible']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Special Hearing for Murder and Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm / Judge Alone Special Hearing After Findings That the Accused Was Unfit to Be Tried and Would Not Become Fit Within 12 Months
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Crown proved beyond reasonable doubt that Michele Noel Risi committed the physical acts causing the death of Shannon Weller.' 'Whether the Crown proved beyond reasonable doubt that Michele Noel Risi assaulted Allyson Thornton occasioning actual bodily harm.' 'Whether Michele Noel Risi established on the balance of probabilities that, because of mental health impairment or cognitive impairment, he did not know that his acts were wrong.' 'Whether the Mental Health and Cognitive Impairment Forensic Provisions Act 2020 (NSW) applied to the special hearing.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court accepted Ms Thornton's account despite the defence criticisms and was satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the accused struck Mr Weller in the head at least once with the white electric guitar, causing fatal traumatic brain injury, and struck Ms Thornton in the leg causing actual bodily harm. On the expert psychiatric evidence of Dr Allnutt and Dr Furst and the broader evidence of the accused's mental state, the Court was satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the accused had a mental health impairment and a cognitive impairment which caused a delusional belief that Ms Thornton was in danger and needed his help, so that he did not know his acts were morally wrong. The...
Court Disposition
Offences proven but the accused not criminally responsible for them.
Orders
- []
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment