R v Biljuh (No 5) [2015] NSWSC 775
On the undisputed Crown evidence, the proposition that the perpetrator merely committed manslaughter was not viable because strangling an elderly woman into unconsciousness, dragging her, inflicting injuries, and applying duct tape over her entire face could not be done without at least an intention to inflict grievous bodily harm; there was no evidence to support leaving manslaughter to the jury.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Trial on a Count of Murder / Procedural Ruling Before Final Addresses on Whether to Leave Manslaughter as an Alternative Verdict
- Outcome
- Manslaughter not left to the jury.
- Legal Topics
- ['murder' 'manslaughter' 'alternative Verdict' 'practice and Procedure' 'intention to Kill or Inflict Grievous Bodily Harm']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Trial on a Count of Murder / Procedural Ruling Before Final Addresses on Whether to Leave Manslaughter as an Alternative Verdict
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether manslaughter should be left to the jury as a viable alternative verdict on a count of murder.' 'Whether there was evidence in the trial capable of supporting an absence of intention to kill or inflict grievous bodily harm.']
Ratio Decidendi
On the undisputed Crown evidence, the proposition that the perpetrator merely committed manslaughter was not viable because strangling an elderly woman into unconsciousness, dragging her, inflicting injuries, and applying duct tape over her entire face could not be done without at least an intention to inflict grievous bodily harm; there was no evidence to support leaving manslaughter to the jury.
Court Disposition
Manslaughter not left to the jury.
Orders
- ['Manslaughter will not be left to the jury.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment