R v Basanovic and ors (No. 3) [2015] NSWSC 1092
The requirement for a tendency notice is dispensed with as the evidence relating to the deceased's ability to arrange for others to assault or deal with persons was already contained in the witness statement served by the Crown, and the Crown is not prejudiced. This evidence is admissible to make less improbable the beliefs and reactions of the accused.
- Parties
- Accused: Michael Basanovic; Accused: Wade Adil Basanovic; Accused: Brian Brown; Prosecution: Crown
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 August 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Evidentiary Ruling
- Outcome
- The question is allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Self Defence, Defence of Another, Tendency Evidence, Evidence Admissibility
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Basanovic
Accused
Wade Adil Basanovic
Accused
Brian Brown
Accused
Crown
Prosecution
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Evidentiary Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether certain evidence regarding the deceased's behaviour is tendency evidence and thus requires a tendency notice under s 97 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)
- 2 Whether such evidence is admissible to render less improbable the beliefs and actions of the accused
Ratio Decidendi
The requirement for a tendency notice is dispensed with as the evidence relating to the deceased's ability to arrange for others to assault or deal with persons was already contained in the witness statement served by the Crown, and the Crown is not prejudiced. This evidence is admissible to make less improbable the beliefs and reactions of the accused.
Court Disposition
The question is allowed.
Orders
- The requirement for a tendency notice is dispensed with.
- The evidence is admissible.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment