R v Adam [2010] NSWSC 1162

R v Adam [2010] NSWSC 1162

The accused, Suliman Adam, suffered from chronic Schizophrenia and at the time of the offence did not know that what he was doing was wrong due to delusional beliefs. Therefore, the defence of mental illness was established on the balance of probabilities, and he was not criminally responsible for the killing of his wife.

Parties
Crown: Regina; Accused: Suliman Nmir Adam
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 October 2010
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judge Alone Trial (verdict and Orders)
Outcome
Not guilty by reason of mental illness
Legal Topics
Murder, Mental Illness Defence, Trial by Judge Alone, M'naghten Rules
Criminal Law Murder Mental Illness Defence Trial by Judge Alone M'naghten Rules

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Crown

Suliman Nmir Adam

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Judge Alone Trial (verdict and Orders)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the accused was mentally ill at the time of the offence and thus not criminally responsible under s 38 of the Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990

Ratio Decidendi

The accused, Suliman Adam, suffered from chronic Schizophrenia and at the time of the offence did not know that what he was doing was wrong due to delusional beliefs. Therefore, the defence of mental illness was established on the balance of probabilities, and he was not criminally responsible for the killing of his wife.

Court Disposition

Not guilty by reason of mental illness

Orders

  • Suliman Adam be detained at the Psychiatric Ward, Long Bay Prison Complex Hospital, or such other place as determined by the Mental Health Review Tribunal, until released by due process of law.
  • Registrar to notify the Minister for Health of this judgment and order.