R v Saalfeld [2007] NSWSC 376
The sentence imposed reflects the objective seriousness of the offence, which was slightly less than mid-range due to the unplanned nature and single stab wound, balanced against the use of a deadly weapon, absence of provocation, and application of the standard non-parole period provisions without special circumstances warranting reduction.
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Offender: Lisa Jane Saalfeld
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 April 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence After Conviction
- Outcome
- Convicted and sentenced
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Sentencing, Standard Non Parole Period
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
Lisa Jane Saalfeld
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence After Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriateness of standard non-parole period for murder conviction under Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 44
- 2 Whether intent was to kill or cause grievous bodily harm
- 3 Objective and subjective seriousness of offence
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence imposed reflects the objective seriousness of the offence, which was slightly less than mid-range due to the unplanned nature and single stab wound, balanced against the use of a deadly weapon, absence of provocation, and application of the standard non-parole period provisions without special circumstances warranting reduction.
Court Disposition
Convicted and sentenced
Orders
- The offender is convicted.
- She is sentenced to a non-parole period of 16 years 6 months.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment