REGINA v. ELPHICK [2000] NSWSC 977
The offender deliberately killed his partner in a vicious act of rage arising from his attempt to impose his will on her. Although his early guilty plea attracted the full utilitarian discount of 25%, his egocentric evidence and lack of true contrition prevented any further allowance for full remorse. Taking account of the objective seriousness, general deterrence, subjective factors, rehabilitation prospects, and relationship murder sentencing guidance, a total sentence of 15 years with a 12 year non-parole period was appropriate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 October 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Law Murder / Sentence Following Guilty Plea
- Outcome
- The offender was sentenced to imprisonment for 15 years with a non-parole period of 12 years.
- Legal Topics
- ['murder' 'early Guilty Plea' 'lack of Contrition' 'general Deterrence' 'relationship Murder']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Law Murder / Sentence Following Guilty Plea
Legal Issues
- 1 ["What sentence should be imposed for the offender's murder of his partner after a guilty plea." "What allowance should be made for the offender's early guilty plea." "Whether the offender's claimed emotional motivation and lack of full contrition affected the sentencing assessment."]
Ratio Decidendi
The offender deliberately killed his partner in a vicious act of rage arising from his attempt to impose his will on her. Although his early guilty plea attracted the full utilitarian discount of 25%, his egocentric evidence and lack of true contrition prevented any further allowance for full remorse. Taking account of the objective seriousness, general deterrence, subjective factors, rehabilitation prospects, and relationship murder sentencing guidance, a total sentence of 15 years with a 12 year non-parole period was appropriate.
Court Disposition
The offender was sentenced to imprisonment for 15 years with a non-parole period of 12 years.
Orders
- ['Imprisonment for 15 years to date from 29 December 1999.' 'The sentence is to include a non-parole period of 12 years to expire on 28 December 2011.' 'The earliest date at which the offender will be eligible for release is 28 December 2011.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment