R v Iusi Afele [2014] NSWSC 366

R v Iusi Afele [2014] NSWSC 366

The Court was satisfied that the accused voluntarily and intentionally stabbed Steven Chesworth causing his death, but the unanimous psychiatric evidence established on the balance of probabilities that at the time he was suffering from treatment-resistant schizophrenia marked by paranoid delusions and auditory hallucinations. Although he knew the nature and quality of his act, he did not know that killing the deceased was morally wrong according to the ordinary standards required by the mental illness defence. The accused was therefore not guilty of murder on the grounds of mental illness and was to be detained under s 39 of the Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 April 2014
Procedural Posture
Criminal Trial for Murder / Judge Alone Trial; Defence of Mental Illness Determined
Outcome
Accused found not guilty of murder on the grounds of mental illness and ordered to be detained until released by due process of law.
Legal Topics
['murder' 'defence of Mental Illness' 'schizophrenia' 'special Verdict of Not Guilty by Reason of Mental Illness' 'forensic Patient Detention']
['criminal Law' 'mental Health Law'] ['murder' 'defence of Mental Illness' 'schizophrenia' 'special Verdict of Not Guilty by Reason of Mental Illness' 'forensic Patient Detention']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Trial for Murder / Judge Alone Trial; Defence of Mental Illness Determined

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the accused committed the physical acts causing Steven Chesworth's death with the requisite intention for murder." 'Whether, at the time of killing the deceased, the accused was suffering from a disease of the mind causing a defect of reason such that he did not know the nature and quality of his act or did not know that what he was doing was wrong.' 'Whether the defence of mental illness was proved on the balance of probabilities.']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court was satisfied that the accused voluntarily and intentionally stabbed Steven Chesworth causing his death, but the unanimous psychiatric evidence established on the balance of probabilities that at the time he was suffering from treatment-resistant schizophrenia marked by paranoid delusions and auditory hallucinations. Although he knew the nature and quality of his act, he did not know that killing the deceased was morally wrong according to the ordinary standards required by the mental illness defence. The accused was therefore not guilty of murder on the grounds of mental illness and was to be detained under s 39 of the Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990.

Court Disposition

Accused found not guilty of murder on the grounds of mental illness and ordered to be detained until released by due process of law.

Orders

  • ['I find the accused, Iusi Afele, not guilty of the murder of Steven Chesworth, on the grounds of mental illness.' 'I order that the accused be detained, pursuant to s 39 of the Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990, in an appropriate correctional centre, or in such facility as the Mental Health Review...