R v Nehme (No 6) [2024] NSWSC 518

R v Nehme (No 6) [2024] NSWSC 518

None of the evidence sought to be adduced concerning co-accuseds' verdicts, their decisions not to testify or raise defences, or the DPP’s decision to discontinue a prosecution is admissible under s 108A or otherwise, as there was no relevant previous representation admitted, and such evidence is irrelevant and inadmissible under the Evidence Act.

Parties
Crown: Rex; Accused: Joseph Nehme
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
06 May 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence at Trial
Outcome
Application to adduce evidence refused; evidence ruled inadmissible.
Legal Topics
Murder, Joint Criminal Enterprise, Admissibility of Evidence, Relevance, Credibility Evidence, S 108 a Evidence Act 1995 (nsw)
Criminal Law Evidence Murder Joint Criminal Enterprise Admissibility of Evidence Relevance Credibility Evidence S 108 a Evidence Act 1995 (nsw)

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Crown

Joseph Nehme

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence at Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether evidence of jury verdicts or decisions not to prosecute in related proceedings is admissible under s 108A of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)
  2. 2 Whether evidence relating to actions or testimony (or lack thereof) of co-accused or associates is relevant and admissible in this trial

Ratio Decidendi

None of the evidence sought to be adduced concerning co-accuseds' verdicts, their decisions not to testify or raise defences, or the DPP’s decision to discontinue a prosecution is admissible under s 108A or otherwise, as there was no relevant previous representation admitted, and such evidence is irrelevant and inadmissible under the Evidence Act.

Court Disposition

Application to adduce evidence refused; evidence ruled inadmissible.

Orders

  • The application by the accused to adduce the following evidence is refused on the basis that the evidence is not admissible: (a) That Viliami Taufahema did not give evidence at his trial and did not raise self-defence; (b) The jury verdicts in the prosecutions of Viliami Taufahema and Sherene Rizk; (c) The decision...