R v Clarke [2023] NSWSC 1360

R v Clarke [2023] NSWSC 1360

On the evidence of psychiatric experts and agreement between the prosecution and the accused, the Court was satisfied the accused suffered from schizoaffective disorder constituting a mental health impairment at the relevant times, impairing his capacity to reason as to the moral wrongfulness of his actions, justifying application of s 31 of the Act. The accused is not criminally responsible for the acts constituting the offences. Special verdicts were therefore entered, and the accused was ordered detained as a forensic patient pending decisions of the Mental Health Review Tribunal.

Parties
Crown: Rex; Accused: Paul Clarke
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 November 2023
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Special Verdict / Orders After Trial (mental Health Defence)
Outcome
Special verdicts of act proven but not criminally responsible entered on both counts; accused detained as a forensic patient under Tribunal supervision; procedural orders made to notify relevant authorities.
Legal Topics
Murder, Mental Health Defence, Special Verdict, Fitness to Stand Trial, Not Criminally Responsible, Forensic Patient Detention
Criminal Law Mental Health Murder Mental Health Defence Special Verdict Fitness to Stand Trial Not Criminally Responsible Forensic Patient Detention

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Crown

Paul Clarke

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Special Verdict / Orders After Trial (mental Health Defence)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the accused was not criminally responsible for the killings by reason of mental health impairment under the Mental Health and Cognitive Impairment Forensic Provisions Act 2020 (NSW)
  2. 2 Whether a special verdict should be entered under s 31 of the Act
  3. 3 Whether the accused should be detained as a forensic patient under ss 33 and 34 of the Act

Ratio Decidendi

On the evidence of psychiatric experts and agreement between the prosecution and the accused, the Court was satisfied the accused suffered from schizoaffective disorder constituting a mental health impairment at the relevant times, impairing his capacity to reason as to the moral wrongfulness of his actions, justifying application of s 31 of the Act. The accused is not criminally responsible for the acts constituting the offences. Special verdicts were therefore entered, and the accused was ordered detained as a forensic patient pending decisions of the Mental Health Review Tribunal.

Court Disposition

Special verdicts of act proven but not criminally responsible entered on both counts; accused detained as a forensic patient under Tribunal supervision; procedural orders made to notify relevant authorities.

Orders

  • In relation to each of the two counts, a special verdict is entered, pursuant to s 31 of the Mental Health and Cognitive Impairment Forensic Provisions Act 2020 (NSW), namely that the act is proven but the accused is not criminally responsible.
  • Pursuant to ss 33 and 34 of the Act, Paul Clarke is to be detained in a correctional facility or at such other place as determined by the Mental Health Review Tribunal, until released by due process of law.