R v Matthews [2014] NSWSC 608
Having regard to the very serious nature of the offending, the high level of moral culpability, the utilitarian value of the plea of guilty entered on the first day of trial, and the requirement that sentencing practice as at 1992 be applied, the appropriate sentence is 21 years and 6 months imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 16 years and 3 months.
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Offender: Steve Isac Matthews
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- Offender convicted and sentenced to imprisonment
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Sentencing, Plea of Guilty, Backdating of Sentence, Sentencing Practice at Time of Offence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
Steve Isac Matthews
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate sentence for the offender convicted of the murder of Pia Navida, having regard to sentencing practices in 1992?
- 2 How should the late plea of guilty be reflected in sentence?
- 3 What is the offender’s level of moral culpability and prospects of rehabilitation?
Ratio Decidendi
Having regard to the very serious nature of the offending, the high level of moral culpability, the utilitarian value of the plea of guilty entered on the first day of trial, and the requirement that sentencing practice as at 1992 be applied, the appropriate sentence is 21 years and 6 months imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 16 years and 3 months.
Court Disposition
Offender convicted and sentenced to imprisonment
Orders
- The offender is convicted of the murder of Pia Navida.
- The offender is sentenced to a non-parole period of 16 years and 3 months imprisonment, commencing on 2 August 2011 and expiring on 1 November 2027, with an additional term of 5 years and 3 months imprisonment, commencing on 2 November 2027 and expiring on 1 February 2033.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment