R v DONAI, Terry Mark [2012] NSWSC 1102

R v DONAI, Terry Mark [2012] NSWSC 1102

The two murders were planned, brutal killings in the victims' home and were committed for financial gain, making the offender's criminality extremely grave. However, life imprisonment was not justified because an appropriate relativity had to be maintained with David Weightman's undiscounted determinate sentence, the case was not found to fall within the worst category or most extreme case, and there was some guarded basis to find reasonable prospects of rehabilitation. Substantial determinate sentences with significant accumulation were required to mark the criminality of each murder.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 September 2012
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence for Murder / Remarks on Sentence After Conviction at Retrial
Outcome
The offender was sentenced to determinate terms of imprisonment for both murders, with the second sentence accumulated by 3 years, producing an aggregate sentence of 43 years and an effective non-parole period of 33 years from 16 June 2006.
Legal Topics
['murder' 'premeditation' 'financial Gain' 'life Imprisonment' 'parity Between Co Offenders' 'non Parole Period' 'accumulation of Sentences']
['criminal Law' 'sentencing'] ['murder' 'premeditation' 'financial Gain' 'life Imprisonment' 'parity Between Co Offenders' 'non Parole Period' 'accumulation of Sentences']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sentence for Murder / Remarks on Sentence After Conviction at Retrial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the gravity of the two murders called for the maximum sentence of life imprisonment under s 61 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 rather than determinate sentences.' "How the offender's culpability compared with that of his co-offender David Weightman and whether parity or appropriate relativity affected sentence." 'Whether disputed evidence about planning and attempted drugging of the victims affected assessment of culpability.' "Whether the offender's background, mental health material, conduct in custody and prospects of rehabilitation affected sentence." 'Whether the sentences for the two murders should be accumulated despite arising from the same criminal episode.']

Ratio Decidendi

The two murders were planned, brutal killings in the victims' home and were committed for financial gain, making the offender's criminality extremely grave. However, life imprisonment was not justified because an appropriate relativity had to be maintained with David Weightman's undiscounted determinate sentence, the case was not found to fall within the worst category or most extreme case, and there was some guarded basis to find reasonable prospects of rehabilitation. Substantial determinate sentences with significant accumulation were required to mark the criminality of each murder.

Court Disposition

The offender was sentenced to determinate terms of imprisonment for both murders, with the second sentence accumulated by 3 years, producing an aggregate sentence of 43 years and an effective non-parole period of 33 years from 16 June 2006.

Orders

  • ['For the murder of Pamela Weightman, Terry Mark Donai is sentenced to imprisonment for 40 years, commencing on 16 June 2006 and expiring on 15 June 2046, with a non-parole period of 30 years, expiring on 15 June 2036.' 'For the murder of William Weightman, Terry Mark Donai is sentenced to imprisonment for 40 years,...