R v Coss (No 1) [2022] NSWSC 530
The view was appropriate because the statutory requirements in s 53 were satisfied, the accused did not oppose the application, the view of the Bingara locations would assist the Court in understanding the evidence, and it would not take excessive time to attend and conduct the view.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Proceeding Murder / Procedural Ruling on Crown Application for View; on the Papers
- Outcome
- Orders sought made.
- Legal Topics
- ['murder' 'view' 'inspection of Locations' 'crown Application Under S 53 of the Evidence Act 1995 (nsw)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Proceeding Murder / Procedural Ruling on Crown Application for View; on the Papers
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether an inspection or view of locations in Bingara should be ordered under s 53 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW).' 'Whether the proposed view would assist the Court in understanding evidence concerning the events leading up to and on the night the deceased was allegedly killed.']
Ratio Decidendi
The view was appropriate because the statutory requirements in s 53 were satisfied, the accused did not oppose the application, the view of the Bingara locations would assist the Court in understanding the evidence, and it would not take excessive time to attend and conduct the view.
Court Disposition
Orders sought made.
Orders
- ["Pursuant to s 53(1) of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), and on satisfaction that the parties will have a reasonable opportunity to be present and that the judge and jury will be present, an inspection is to be held of the outside of 6 Bassett St, Bingara; the outside of 8 Bassett St, Bingara; the Sportsman's Hotel, 31...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment