R v Dong [2020] NSWSC 1277

R v Dong [2020] NSWSC 1277

The Court was satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the offender's Google searches and conduct showed that the murder was premeditated and that he intended to kill Ms Yu by turning off the power to lure her from her room. The offence was of considerable objective seriousness and aggravated by being committed in the victim's home and by the disposal of her body. Although the offender suffered from schizophrenia and was of subnormal intelligence, there was no evidence that the killing was the product of a psychotic episode; those conditions reduced moral culpability and general deterrence only to a limited extent. The guilty plea attracted a 25% discount, reducing an otherwise appropriate...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 September 2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence for Murder / Sentence Following Plea of Guilty
Outcome
Sentenced to imprisonment for 18 years with a non-parole period of 13 years and 6 months commencing on 9 June 2018.
Legal Topics
['murder' 'plea of Guilty' 'premeditation' 'intent to Kill' 'mental Illness' 'schizophrenia' 'moral Culpability' 'general Deterrence' 'non Parole Period' 'victim Impact Statement' 'disposal of Body']
['criminal Law' 'sentencing'] ['murder' 'plea of Guilty' 'premeditation' 'intent to Kill' 'mental Illness' 'schizophrenia' 'moral Culpability' 'general Deterrence' 'non Parole Period' 'victim Impact Statement' 'disposal of Body']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sentence for Murder / Sentence Following Plea of Guilty

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the murder was premeditated and involved an intent to kill.' "Whether the offence was aggravated by being committed in the victim's home and by disposal of the body." "What effect the offender's schizophrenia, subnormal intelligence, youth and background should have on moral culpability, deterrence and sentence." 'Whether the offender was remorseful.' 'Whether special circumstances warranted departure from the statutory proportion between sentence and non-parole period.' 'What sentence and non-parole period should be imposed after the guilty plea discount.']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court was satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the offender's Google searches and conduct showed that the murder was premeditated and that he intended to kill Ms Yu by turning off the power to lure her from her room. The offence was of considerable objective seriousness and aggravated by being committed in the victim's home and by the disposal of her body. Although the offender suffered from schizophrenia and was of subnormal intelligence, there was no evidence that the killing was the product of a psychotic episode; those conditions reduced moral culpability and general deterrence only to a limited extent. The guilty plea attracted a 25% discount, reducing an otherwise appropriate...

Court Disposition

Sentenced to imprisonment for 18 years with a non-parole period of 13 years and 6 months commencing on 9 June 2018.

Orders

  • ['Shuo Dong, for the murder of Qi Yu, is sentenced to a non-parole period of 13 years and 6 months, commencing on 9 June 2018 and expiring on 8 December 2031.' 'The balance of term is 4 years and 6 months, commencing on 9 December 2031 and expiring on 8 June 2036.' 'The offender will be eligible for release on...