R v Mapp [2024] NSWSC 1267

R v Mapp [2024] NSWSC 1267

The application for trial by judge alone was refused as the court was not satisfied that any prejudicial matters raised by the accused could not be cured by limiting evidence and/or judicial directions, and that the defence of substantial impairment involves an application of objective community standards, which is best determined by a jury.

Parties
Prosecutor: Rex (Crown); Accused: David Mapp
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Pre Trial Application for Trial by Judge Alone
Outcome
Application refused
Legal Topics
Murder, Trial by Judge Alone, Partial Defence Substantial Impairment, Self Defence, Community Standards, Prejudicial Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 20 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex (Crown)

Prosecutor

David Mapp

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Pre Trial Application for Trial by Judge Alone

  1. 1 Whether it is in the interests of justice to order a trial by judge alone under ss 132 and 132A of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW)
  2. 2 Whether substantial impairment defence involves application of community standards warranting trial by jury
  3. 3 Whether prejudicial evidence relevant to expert opinions prevents a fair jury trial

Ratio Decidendi

The application for trial by judge alone was refused as the court was not satisfied that any prejudicial matters raised by the accused could not be cured by limiting evidence and/or judicial directions, and that the defence of substantial impairment involves an application of objective community standards, which is best determined by a jury.

Court Disposition

Application refused

Orders

  • The application for trial by judge alone is refused.