R v Hunter [2013] NSWSC 1713

R v Hunter [2013] NSWSC 1713

Although the Court had significant misgivings about the lateness and basis of the application, and recognised the public interest in expedition and the adverse effects of a last-minute vacation, the accused was facing trial for murder and sought time to explore an issue that might constitute a defence or partial defence. In all the circumstances, a cautious approach required that the accused not be shut out from taking those steps, so the trial date was vacated.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
13 November 2013
Procedural Posture
Criminal Proceedings for Murder / Interlocutory Application by Notice of Motion to Vacate Jury Trial Date
Outcome
Application to vacate trial date granted.
Legal Topics
['murder Trial' 'vacating Trial Date' 'substantial Mental Impairment' 'pre Trial Defence Disclosure' 'case Management' 'statutory Notice Obligations']
['criminal Law' 'criminal Procedure'] ['murder Trial' 'vacating Trial Date' 'substantial Mental Impairment' 'pre Trial Defence Disclosure' 'case Management' 'statutory Notice Obligations']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Proceedings for Murder / Interlocutory Application by Notice of Motion to Vacate Jury Trial Date

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the jury trial date should be vacated on a very late defence application to explore a possible partial defence of substantial mental impairment.' 'Whether the accused should be given further time to investigate possible neurological, psychological or psychiatric issues arising from an alleged head injury and alcohol or drug consumption.' "How the public interest in expedition and compliance with statutory notice and case management obligations should be balanced against the accused's opportunity to prepare and present his case."]

Ratio Decidendi

Although the Court had significant misgivings about the lateness and basis of the application, and recognised the public interest in expedition and the adverse effects of a last-minute vacation, the accused was facing trial for murder and sought time to explore an issue that might constitute a defence or partial defence. In all the circumstances, a cautious approach required that the accused not be shut out from taking those steps, so the trial date was vacated.

Court Disposition

Application to vacate trial date granted.

Orders

  • ['Trial fixed for 11 November 2013 vacated.']