R v Dawson [2022] NSWSC 785
MFI 20 was clearly relevant to the issue of JC's credit concerning evidence about a conversation involving the consequences of Christopher Dawson leaving Lynette Dawson, and the objections raised on behalf of the accused did not provide an impediment to its tender.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Murder Trial / Procedural Ruling on Objection to Tender of Document
- Outcome
- The Crown was permitted to tender MFI 20 as Exhibit AS.
- Legal Topics
- ['murder Trial' 'tender of Document' 'relevance' 'credit of Witness' 'unfavourable Witness Cross Examination']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Murder Trial / Procedural Ruling on Objection to Tender of Document
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Crown should be permitted to tender MFI 20 as an exhibit.' 'Whether objections on behalf of the accused were an impediment to the tender of MFI 20.' 'Whether MFI 20 was relevant to the credit of JC on the 60-70% issue.']
Ratio Decidendi
MFI 20 was clearly relevant to the issue of JC's credit concerning evidence about a conversation involving the consequences of Christopher Dawson leaving Lynette Dawson, and the objections raised on behalf of the accused did not provide an impediment to its tender.
Court Disposition
The Crown was permitted to tender MFI 20 as Exhibit AS.
Orders
- ['Permit the Crown to tender MFI 20 as Exhibit AS.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment