R v Dawson [2022] NSWSC 759
The Crown's material established a medical condition and a desire by Mr Silkman not to travel, but did not establish that he was medically unable safely to attend court. Given the anticipated importance and nature of his evidence and the accused's need to put documents to him, the defence concern that he attend in person was well-founded, so the application to take his evidence by audio visual link was refused.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Murder Trial / Procedural Ruling on Crown Application to Take Evidence by Audio Visual Link
- Outcome
- Application refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['murder Trial' 'evidence by Audio Visual Link' 'witness Attendance' 'medical Condition of Witness']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Murder Trial / Procedural Ruling on Crown Application to Take Evidence by Audio Visual Link
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Crown witness Robert Silkman should be permitted to give evidence by audio visual link from a remote location rather than attend court personally.' "Whether the witness's medical material justified remote evidence despite the accused's objection based on the nature of the anticipated evidence and intended cross-examination with documents."]
Ratio Decidendi
The Crown's material established a medical condition and a desire by Mr Silkman not to travel, but did not establish that he was medically unable safely to attend court. Given the anticipated importance and nature of his evidence and the accused's need to put documents to him, the defence concern that he attend in person was well-founded, so the application to take his evidence by audio visual link was refused.
Court Disposition
Application refused.
Orders
- ['Refuse application to take evidence by audio visual link.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment