Rrumburriya Borroloola Claim Group v Northern Territory of Australia [2016] FCA 776
The rights of the Rrumburriya Borroloola Group to access and take resources from the claim area are not confined to personal or communal purposes of a domestic or subsistence nature. The Court accepted the right to access and take for any purpose the resources of the area as established under traditional law and custom at sovereignty, subject to traditional normative constraints (e.g. no waste, respect for sacred sites). Interactions with Macassan trepangers and with neighbouring Indigenous groups evidenced customary resource use including exchange, barter, and trade not limited to ceremonial or domestic contexts. The right is established as unconfined, and not restrictively defined by...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 June 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Native Title Application / Post Hearing Judgment and Orders
- Outcome
- Partly successful – native title determined, form of final orders to be brought in by parties
- Legal Topics
- ['native Title Rights and Interests' 'extinguishment of Native Title' 'resource Use and Access' 'commercial Use of Native Title Resources' 'traditional Laws and Customs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Native Title Application / Post Hearing Judgment and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether native title rights include the right to access and take resources for any purpose, including commercial purposes' 'Whether native title was extinguished wholly, partially, or not at all over various parts of the claim area' 'Appropriate formulation of rights regarding waters and subsoil where there is water from time to time' 'Application and effect of s 47A and 47B Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)']
Ratio Decidendi
The rights of the Rrumburriya Borroloola Group to access and take resources from the claim area are not confined to personal or communal purposes of a domestic or subsistence nature. The Court accepted the right to access and take for any purpose the resources of the area as established under traditional law and custom at sovereignty, subject to traditional normative constraints (e.g. no waste, respect for sacred sites). Interactions with Macassan trepangers and with neighbouring Indigenous groups evidenced customary resource use including exchange, barter, and trade not limited to ceremonial or domestic contexts. The right is established as unconfined, and not restrictively defined by...
Court Disposition
Partly successful – native title determined, form of final orders to be brought in by parties
Orders
- ['The parties are to bring in within a period to be specified minutes of the determination and orders to give effect to the reasons for judgment.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment