Egan v Mangarelli [2013] NSWCA 413

Egan v Mangarelli [2013] NSWCA 413

The evidence did not establish, on the balance of probabilities, that the bus driver failed to keep a proper lookout or breached his duty of care; the circumstances gave rise to conflicting conjectures of equal probability as to how the accident occurred, and no definite inference of negligence could be drawn. The trial judge's findings on contributory negligence and damages, absent an error of principle, were not lightly to be disturbed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
05 December 2013
Procedural Posture
Appeal and Cross Appeal From Supreme Court of NSW (common Law Division) / Judgment on Appeal and Cross Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['negligence' 'breach of Duty of Care' 'motor Vehicle Accident' 'contributory Negligence' 'damages Personal Injury']
['torts'] ['negligence' 'breach of Duty of Care' 'motor Vehicle Accident' 'contributory Negligence' 'damages Personal Injury']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal and Cross Appeal From Supreme Court of NSW (common Law Division) / Judgment on Appeal and Cross Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the driver of the bus breached his duty of care in failing to keep a proper lookout' 'Whether the trial judge properly assessed contributory negligence at 70%' 'Whether damages awarded for prosthesis, housing modifications, and domestic care were correct']

Ratio Decidendi

The evidence did not establish, on the balance of probabilities, that the bus driver failed to keep a proper lookout or breached his duty of care; the circumstances gave rise to conflicting conjectures of equal probability as to how the accident occurred, and no definite inference of negligence could be drawn. The trial judge's findings on contributory negligence and damages, absent an error of principle, were not lightly to be disturbed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Appeal dismissed.' "The appellant to pay the respondents' costs of the appeal." 'Cross-appeal dismissed.']