San v Rumble [2007] NSWCA 256
The claimant failed to prove that interference with work capacity was productive of a loss sufficient to warrant an award for future economic loss, nor establish a basis for future medical expenses. Thus, the trial judge's decision was upheld.
- Parties
- Claimant: Sonyda San; Opponent: Matthew Rumble
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 July 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Summons for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Summons for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Summons for Leave to Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Motor Vehicle Accident
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sonyda San
Claimant
Matthew Rumble
Opponent
Procedural Posture
Summons for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Summons for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant suffered economic loss due to injuries from a motor vehicle accident
- 2 Whether there is an entitlement to future medical expenses
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant failed to prove that interference with work capacity was productive of a loss sufficient to warrant an award for future economic loss, nor establish a basis for future medical expenses. Thus, the trial judge's decision was upheld.
Court Disposition
Summons for Leave to Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- Summons for Leave to Appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment