HARRISON v GOVERNMENT INSURANCE OFFICE OF NEW SOUTH WALES [1992] NSWCA 106
On the trial judge's findings, the defendant driver's failure to keep a proper lookout and to give way was a contributing cause to the accident and the injuries suffered by the plaintiff, and no valid defences of volenti non fit injuria or contributory negligence were established; therefore, the plaintiff is entitled to judgment.
- Parties
- Appellant/plaintiff: Harrison; Respondent/defendant: Government Insurance Office of New South Wales
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 August 1992
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; judgment entered for the plaintiff; damages awarded.
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Motor Vehicle Accidents, Causation, Appellate Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Harrison
Appellant/plaintiff
Government Insurance Office of New South Wales
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in finding no causation between the negligence of the driver and the plaintiff's injuries.
- 2 Scope of appellate rehearing where credibility is not at issue.
- 3 Application of volenti non fit injuria and contributory negligence.
Ratio Decidendi
On the trial judge's findings, the defendant driver's failure to keep a proper lookout and to give way was a contributing cause to the accident and the injuries suffered by the plaintiff, and no valid defences of volenti non fit injuria or contributory negligence were established; therefore, the plaintiff is entitled to judgment.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; judgment entered for the plaintiff; damages awarded.
Orders
- Appeal allowed
- Set aside the judgment of Sully J in favour of the defendant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment