Treeve v Blue Star Line (Australia) Pty Ltd [1957] HCA 20

Treeve v Blue Star Line (Australia) Pty Ltd [1957] HCA 20

On the evidence, the defendant company did not have occupation or control of the ship or any part of it so as to be an occupier owing a duty of care to the plaintiff as invitee. There was no satisfactory evidence of negligence, and in any case, the verdict might have been based on a suggestion not supported by the pleadings.

Parties
Appellant, Plaintiff: William Henry Treeve; Respondent, Defendant: Blue Star Line (Australia) Pty. Ltd.
Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Negligence, Appeal / Appeal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales (full Court) to High Court of Australia
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Negligence, Duty of Care, Dangerous Premises, Occupier's Liability, Personal Injuries
Tort Law Negligence Duty of Care Dangerous Premises Occupier's Liability Personal Injuries

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

William Henry Treeve

Appellant, Plaintiff

Blue Star Line (Australia) Pty. Ltd.

Respondent, Defendant

Procedural Posture

Negligence, Appeal / Appeal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales (full Court) to High Court of Australia

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent was an occupier in control of the ship or part of it so as to owe a duty of care to the plaintiff as invitee
  2. 2 Whether there was evidence of negligence on the part of the respondent

Ratio Decidendi

On the evidence, the defendant company did not have occupation or control of the ship or any part of it so as to be an occupier owing a duty of care to the plaintiff as invitee. There was no satisfactory evidence of negligence, and in any case, the verdict might have been based on a suggestion not supported by the pleadings.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs