R v NK [2015] NSWSC 1281
Given the threats and risk to safety of those involved, and to preserve the proper administration of justice, it is necessary to make suppression and non-publication orders restricting the disclosure of certain information.
- Parties
- Offender: NK; Prosecution: Crown
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 August 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Suppression and Non Publication Orders
- Outcome
- Suppression and non-publication orders made, court to be closed during specified evidence.
- Legal Topics
- Non Publication Orders, Suppression Orders, Court Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NK
Offender
Crown
Prosecution
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Suppression and Non Publication Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether suppression and non-publication orders should be made regarding the identity of the offender and related persons, and the contents of certain evidence.
Ratio Decidendi
Given the threats and risk to safety of those involved, and to preserve the proper administration of justice, it is necessary to make suppression and non-publication orders restricting the disclosure of certain information.
Court Disposition
Suppression and non-publication orders made, court to be closed during specified evidence.
Orders
- No publication or disclosure of information tending to reveal the identity or whereabouts of the offender or specified persons, pursuant to s 7A of the Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW).
- Suppression order pursuant to s 7B of the Act restricting disclosure of information concerning the assistance provided by the offender to police and prosecution, except as required for ongoing related proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment