Rusiti v Alkhoshaibi [2007] NSWSC 1374

Rusiti v Alkhoshaibi [2007] NSWSC 1374

The court held that the notices to produce were, in the circumstances, invalid as they were an improper substitute for discovery and were vexatious and oppressive. Security for costs was appropriate given the plaintiffs' impecuniosity, absence of significant delay or prejudice, and lack of satisfactory undertaking from individual plaintiffs. The court further determined it was appropriate to attach a condition regarding costs indemnity to the s237 leave, and dismissed certain interlocutory applications.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
08 December 2007
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Applications in Equity Proceedings / Interlocutory Decision
Outcome
Interlocutory applications: plaintiffs granted leave to amend, orders as to security for costs, partial dismissal of applications, orders as per paragraph 82 of the judgment.
Legal Topics
['notices to Produce' 'discovery' 'security for Costs' 'derivative Actions' 'redemption of Mortgage' 'costs Orders']
['civil Procedure' 'corporations Law'] ['notices to Produce' 'discovery' 'security for Costs' 'derivative Actions' 'redemption of Mortgage' 'costs Orders']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Applications in Equity Proceedings / Interlocutory Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Validity of notices to produce and whether they are a substitute for discovery' 'Whether notices to produce were vexatious and oppressive' 'Entitlement to order security for costs and related relief' 'Standing to seek redemption of mortgage and taking of accounts' 'Whether condition as to costs can be attached to previous leave under Corporations Act s237']

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the notices to produce were, in the circumstances, invalid as they were an improper substitute for discovery and were vexatious and oppressive. Security for costs was appropriate given the plaintiffs' impecuniosity, absence of significant delay or prejudice, and lack of satisfactory undertaking from individual plaintiffs. The court further determined it was appropriate to attach a condition regarding costs indemnity to the s237 leave, and dismissed certain interlocutory applications.

Court Disposition

Interlocutory applications: plaintiffs granted leave to amend, orders as to security for costs, partial dismissal of applications, orders as per paragraph 82 of the judgment.

Orders

  • ['Grant plaintiffs leave to further amend originating process, to be filed by 7 December 2007.' "Order plaintiffs to pay defendants' costs thrown away by amendment." "Dismiss plaintiffs' interlocutory process of 14 August 2007 except as to amendment." "Make orders setting aside notices to produce as per third...