Hancock v Rinehart [2015] NSWSC 896
The plaintiffs' application to set aside the notice to produce is dismissed because (i) the 'on the cards' test applies to determine whether production is required; (ii) the documents sought are necessary for the just resolution of the real issues in the proceedings, namely, the proper determination of the gross sum costs order and any interest claimed; and (iii) the risk of a detailed assessment arising is caused by the form in which the application is presented by the plaintiffs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Division Civil Proceeding / Motion to Set Aside Notice to Produce (interlocutory Application)
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs' notice of motion dismissed; plaintiffs to pay first defendant's costs; notice to produce stood over.
- Legal Topics
- ['notice to Produce' 'gross Sum Costs Order' 'costs Assessment' 'disclosure of Legal Costs Documents']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Division Civil Proceeding / Motion to Set Aside Notice to Produce (interlocutory Application)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the plaintiffs should be required to produce tax invoices, itemised bills, and funding agreements in relation to their application for a gross sum costs order' "Whether production should only occur if it appears likely that the documents will materially assist the first defendant's case, or if the 'on the cards' test applies" 'Whether disclosure is necessary for the resolution of the real issues in dispute']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiffs' application to set aside the notice to produce is dismissed because (i) the 'on the cards' test applies to determine whether production is required; (ii) the documents sought are necessary for the just resolution of the real issues in the proceedings, namely, the proper determination of the gross sum costs order and any interest claimed; and (iii) the risk of a detailed assessment arising is caused by the form in which the application is presented by the plaintiffs.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs' notice of motion dismissed; plaintiffs to pay first defendant's costs; notice to produce stood over.
Orders
- ["Order that the plaintiffs' notice of motion filed 23 December 2014 be dismissed" "Order that the plaintiffs pay the first defendant's costs" "Stand over notice to produce to the Registrar's list on 8 July 2015"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment