Donnelly v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2014] NSWCA 93
The notice to produce, whether in its original form or as proposed to be reframed, did not seek production of any document which was or might be relevant to a fact in issue in the appeal, and therefore it was set aside.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 March 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Court of Appeal Application by Notice of Motion to Set Aside a Notice to Produce Filed in an Appeal
- Outcome
- Notice to produce set aside; respondent to the notice of motion ordered to pay the costs of the notice of motion.
- Legal Topics
- ['notice to Produce' 'relevance to a Fact in Issue on Appeal' 'fresh Evidence on Appeal' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Court of Appeal Application by Notice of Motion to Set Aside a Notice to Produce Filed in an Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the notice to produce sought documents relevant to a fact in issue in the appeal.' 'Whether the notice to produce should be set aside.']
Ratio Decidendi
The notice to produce, whether in its original form or as proposed to be reframed, did not seek production of any document which was or might be relevant to a fact in issue in the appeal, and therefore it was set aside.
Court Disposition
Notice to produce set aside; respondent to the notice of motion ordered to pay the costs of the notice of motion.
Orders
- ['Notice to produce filed on 12 March 2014 set aside.' 'Respondent to the notice of motion to pay the costs thereof.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment