Chehelnabi v Gourmet and Leisure Holdings Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCATAP 102
The Tribunal found, and the Appeal Panel agreed, that the appellants did not establish on the evidence that the noise or disturbances constituted a nuisance within the meaning of s 153 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW), as there was no sufficient objective evidence the use of the commercial lot was excessive or unreasonable beyond ordinary standards.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 June 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['nuisance' 'noise Complaints' 'strata Schemes' 'residential and Commercial Properties' "interpretation of 'nuisance' Under Strata Schemes Management Act"]
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether noise and related disturbances from a commercial lot constituted a nuisance under s 153 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW)' "Whether the Tribunal at first instance failed to consider the appellants' evidence or gave insufficient reasons" 'Whether the decision was not fair and equitable or was against the weight of evidence']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found, and the Appeal Panel agreed, that the appellants did not establish on the evidence that the noise or disturbances constituted a nuisance within the meaning of s 153 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW), as there was no sufficient objective evidence the use of the commercial lot was excessive or unreasonable beyond ordinary standards.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ["The appellants' application for leave to rely on the proposed amended Notice of Appeal is allowed." 'The appeal is dismissed.' 'The respondents are to lodge submissions and evidence in support of any costs application with the Appeal Registry and give them to the appellants within 14 days of publication of the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment