Torette House Pty Ltd v Berkman [1940] HCA 1

Torette House Pty Ltd v Berkman [1940] HCA 1

The defendant, as occupier, is not liable in nuisance, under Rylands v. Fletcher, or for negligence, when the damage is caused by the escape of water through an unknown and latent defect, and the negligent act of an independent contractor lawfully employed for non-hazardous work, where there was no personal fault, no non-natural use of land, and the defect could not be reasonably anticipated or discovered.

Parties
Appellant; Plaintiff: Torette House Proprietary Limited; Respondent; Defendant: William Berkman
Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From Full Court of the Supreme Court of New South Wales to High Court of Australia
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Nuisance, Rylands V. Fletcher Rule, Liability for Independent Contractors, Negligence, Non Natural Use of Land
Torts Nuisance Rylands V. Fletcher Rule Liability for Independent Contractors Negligence Non Natural Use of Land

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 34 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Torette House Proprietary Limited

Appellant; Plaintiff

William Berkman

Respondent; Defendant

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Appeal From Full Court of the Supreme Court of New South Wales to High Court of Australia

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant is liable in nuisance, under the rule in Rylands v. Fletcher, or for negligence for the escape of water caused by an independent contractor's negligence, where the defect was unknown to the defendant.

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant, as occupier, is not liable in nuisance, under Rylands v. Fletcher, or for negligence, when the damage is caused by the escape of water through an unknown and latent defect, and the negligent act of an independent contractor lawfully employed for non-hazardous work, where there was no personal fault, no non-natural use of land, and the defect could not be reasonably anticipated or discovered.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs.