Enzo Jair Ploder v Vittoria Angelina Garcea (as executor of the estate of the late Fiona Rita Garcea) [2013] NSWSC 251
There is no binding settlement agreement between the parties because the defendant’s response was not an unqualified acceptance of the plaintiff’s offer, but was subject to conditions that altered the terms proposed, consistent with the principle that an acceptance that does not exactly match the offer is ineffective.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 March 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Notice of Motion Seeking Declarations as to the Existence of a Binding Settlement Agreement
- Outcome
- Notice of motion dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['offer and Acceptance' 'settlement Agreements' 'family Provision Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Notice of Motion Seeking Declarations as to the Existence of a Binding Settlement Agreement
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the parties entered into a binding settlement agreement']
Ratio Decidendi
There is no binding settlement agreement between the parties because the defendant’s response was not an unqualified acceptance of the plaintiff’s offer, but was subject to conditions that altered the terms proposed, consistent with the principle that an acceptance that does not exactly match the offer is ineffective.
Court Disposition
Notice of motion dismissed.
Orders
- ['Notice of motion dismissed.' 'Costs of the motion will be costs in the cause.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment