R v Dahdah [2021] NSWDC 810
The ongoing supply offence, with Form 1 matters, and the supply offence warranted imprisonment, but after a 25% discount for the guilty pleas, consideration of time already spent in custody, below mid-range objective seriousness, absence of significant prior convictions, remorse, insight, family support, and reasonable but guarded rehabilitation prospects, and because there was no evidence that community safety would be compromised, an aggregate sentence of two years' imprisonment was appropriate to be served by way of an intensive correction order.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence for Drug Offences / Sentencing After Pleas of Guilty
- Outcome
- Offender convicted and sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of two years to be served by way of an intensive correction order commencing 23 November 2021.
- Legal Topics
- ['ongoing Supply Prohibited Drug' 'supply Prohibited Drug' 'possess Prohibited Drug' 'form 1 Offences' 'intensive Correction Order' 'plea of Guilty' 'rehabilitation' 'remorse' 'drug Addiction' 'community Safety']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence for Drug Offences / Sentencing After Pleas of Guilty
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What sentence should be imposed for ongoing supply of prohibited drug, supply prohibited drug, and Form 1 matters.' 'Whether the sentence should be served by way of an intensive correction order.' "How the offender's guilty pleas, time in custody, subjective circumstances, rehabilitation prospects, drug addiction, and risk of reoffending should affect sentence."]
Ratio Decidendi
The ongoing supply offence, with Form 1 matters, and the supply offence warranted imprisonment, but after a 25% discount for the guilty pleas, consideration of time already spent in custody, below mid-range objective seriousness, absence of significant prior convictions, remorse, insight, family support, and reasonable but guarded rehabilitation prospects, and because there was no evidence that community safety would be compromised, an aggregate sentence of two years' imprisonment was appropriate to be served by way of an intensive correction order.
Court Disposition
Offender convicted and sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of two years to be served by way of an intensive correction order commencing 23 November 2021.
Orders
- ['The offender is convicted of each offence.' 'Taking into account a discount of 25% for the pleas of guilty, the indicative sentence for sequence 1, taking into account the Form 1 matters (Sequence 16, 17, 19, 20, 21), is 2 years.' 'Taking into account a discount of 25% for the pleas of guilty, the indicative...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment