R v LMW [1999] NSWSC 1111
Exceptional circumstances warranting the exclusion of the media from the courtroom during the child's evidence have not been established on the evidence before the Court. Protective orders already in place sufficiently safeguard the child witness' identity and wellbeing, and further exclusion is unjustified.
- Parties
- Accused: LMW; Crown: Regina; Media Opponent: Nine Network Limited; Media Opponent: Seven Network Limited; Media Opponent: Australian Broadcasting Corporation
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Interlocutory Application on Evidentiary Procedure
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- Open Justice, Child Witness Protection, Exclusion of Media, Courtroom Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LMW
Accused
Regina
Crown
Nine Network Limited
Media Opponent
Seven Network Limited
Media Opponent
Australian Broadcasting Corporation
Media Opponent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Interlocutory Application on Evidentiary Procedure
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the media should be excluded from the courtroom during the evidence of a child witness.
- 2 Whether exceptional circumstances warrant an order for evidence to be given in a closed court.
Ratio Decidendi
Exceptional circumstances warranting the exclusion of the media from the courtroom during the child's evidence have not been established on the evidence before the Court. Protective orders already in place sufficiently safeguard the child witness' identity and wellbeing, and further exclusion is unjustified.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- Orders previously made under ss 10 and 11 of the Children's (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 remain in force prohibiting publication or broadcast of the child's identity or identifying material.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment