R v Pirrello, Pirrello & D’Agostino [2019] NSWSC 1427
The application to exclude Frank D'Agostino from the public gallery was refused because, despite some juror anxiety and his central role in the case, he conducted himself quietly and respectfully, there was no concrete evidence of disruption or prejudice, and the paramount principle of open justice weighed against exclusion in the absence of compelling necessity.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina (Crown); Accused: Joseph D'Agostino; Accused: Michael Pirrello; Accused: Francesco Pirrello
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 October 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Interlocutory Application During Trial
- Outcome
- Application by the Crown refused
- Legal Topics
- Open Justice, Courtroom Exclusion, Jury Trial, Trial Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina (Crown)
Prosecution
Joseph D'Agostino
Accused
Michael Pirrello
Accused
Francesco Pirrello
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Interlocutory Application During Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court should exclude Frank D'Agostino, a co-conspirator and family member of the accused, from the public gallery during the trial in the interests of justice
Ratio Decidendi
The application to exclude Frank D'Agostino from the public gallery was refused because, despite some juror anxiety and his central role in the case, he conducted himself quietly and respectfully, there was no concrete evidence of disruption or prejudice, and the paramount principle of open justice weighed against exclusion in the absence of compelling necessity.
Court Disposition
Application by the Crown refused
Orders
- The application to exclude Frank D'Agostino from the public gallery is refused.
- The position may be reconsidered if circumstances change.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment