Campbell v BackOffice Investments Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 95

Campbell v BackOffice Investments Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 95

Majority held that misleading or deceptive conduct by Mr Campbell induced BackOffice to purchase a share at $850,000 based on incorrect financial representations. Damages were awarded for the full amount paid, as BackOffice would not have purchased but for the misrepresentations. The buy-out (oppression) remedy was inappropriate after consensual liquidation steps and business sale, as the oppression had ceased and there was no utility in such an order. However, damages for misleading or deceptive conduct were appropriate.

Parties
First Appellant: Douglas Ronald Campbell; Second Appellant: Sentinel Construction Managers Pty Ltd; First Respondent: BackOffice Investments Pty Ltd; Second Respondent: Timothy Andrew Weeks
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 May 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment (with Subsequent Special Leave to High Court Granted)
Outcome
Appeal allowed and cross-appeal allowed in part (majority). Buy-out order set aside. Judgment entered for BackOffice Investments Pty Ltd against Mr Campbell for $850,000 in damages for misleading or deceptive conduct. 90% of respondents' costs in this Court to be paid by appellant.
Legal Topics
Oppression (corporations Act), Shareholder Remedies, Breach of Warranty, Damages, Misleading or Deceptive Conduct (fair Trading Act), Share Buy Out Orders
Corporations Contract Equity Misleading or Deceptive Conduct Oppression (corporations Act) Shareholder Remedies Breach of Warranty Damages +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 30 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Douglas Ronald Campbell

First Appellant

Sentinel Construction Managers Pty Ltd

Second Appellant

BackOffice Investments Pty Ltd

First Respondent

Timothy Andrew Weeks

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment (with Subsequent Special Leave to High Court Granted)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there was oppression under s 232 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) justifying a buy-out order under s 233.
  2. 2 Whether misleading or deceptive conduct occurred contrary to the Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) s 42, and if so, whether loss was suffered and damages should be awarded.
  3. 3 Whether exclusion from management and non-payment of fees constituted oppression or breach of contract.

Ratio Decidendi

Majority held that misleading or deceptive conduct by Mr Campbell induced BackOffice to purchase a share at $850,000 based on incorrect financial representations. Damages were awarded for the full amount paid, as BackOffice would not have purchased but for the misrepresentations. The buy-out (oppression) remedy was inappropriate after consensual liquidation steps and business sale, as the oppression had ceased and there was no utility in such an order. However, damages for misleading or deceptive conduct were appropriate.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed and cross-appeal allowed in part (majority). Buy-out order set aside. Judgment entered for BackOffice Investments Pty Ltd against Mr Campbell for $850,000 in damages for misleading or deceptive conduct. 90% of respondents' costs in this Court to be paid by appellant.

Orders

  • Appeal allowed and cross-appeal allowed in part.
  • Set aside the declaration and orders (1), (2) and (3) made on 29 March 2007 and the $853,000 judgment.