Chief Disruption Officer Pty Ltd as Trustee for the McDonald Family Trust v Michel, in the matter of Laava ID Pty Ltd (No 4) [2023] FCA 25
A declaration should be made that Laava ID Pty Ltd engaged in oppressive conduct by issuing shares to majority parties without giving the same conversion opportunity to the minority; a buy-out order is not appropriate as it would be disproportionate and go beyond remedying the specific oppression found. Because less intrusive relief was available (offering conversion to shares), and the minority did not seek or accept such a remedy, the proceeding is otherwise dismissed.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Chief Disruption Officer Pty Ltd as Trustee for the McDonald Family Trust; Second Plaintiff: Iain James McDonald; First Defendant: Patrick Michel; Second Defendant: Anthony Surtees; Third Defendant: Wilemich Pty Ltd as Trustee for the Path Family Trust; Fourth Defendant: Mortgage Company of Australia Pty Limited as Trustee for the Surtees Family Trust; Fifth Defendant: Laava ID Pty Ltd; Sixth Defendant: Gavin Ger; Seventh Defendant: Wyargine Group Pty Ltd; Eighth Defendant: Lufrapa Pty Ltd as Trustee for the Lucette Michael Family Trust; Ninth Defendant: Robert Fitzpatrick
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 January 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations – Oppression Proceedings / Final Judgment With Orders
- Outcome
- Declaration made regarding oppressive conduct; proceeding otherwise dismissed; directions given regarding costs.
- Legal Topics
- Oppressive Conduct, Remedies Under Corporations Act S 233, Conversion of Loans to Equity, Shareholder Remedies
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chief Disruption Officer Pty Ltd as Trustee for the McDonald Family Trust
First Plaintiff
Iain James McDonald
Second Plaintiff
Patrick Michel
First Defendant
Anthony Surtees
Second Defendant
Wilemich Pty Ltd as Trustee for the Path Family Trust
Third Defendant
Mortgage Company of Australia Pty Limited as Trustee for the Surtees Family Trust
Fourth Defendant
Laava ID Pty Ltd
Fifth Defendant
Gavin Ger
Sixth Defendant
Wyargine Group Pty Ltd
Seventh Defendant
Lufrapa Pty Ltd as Trustee for the Lucette Michael Family Trust
Eighth Defendant
Robert Fitzpatrick
Ninth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Corporations – Oppression Proceedings / Final Judgment With Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the affairs of the fifth defendant (Laava ID Pty Ltd) were conducted in a manner unfairly prejudicial to or discriminatory against the first plaintiff within the meaning of s 232 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
- 2 Appropriate remedy under s 233 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for oppressive conduct
Ratio Decidendi
A declaration should be made that Laava ID Pty Ltd engaged in oppressive conduct by issuing shares to majority parties without giving the same conversion opportunity to the minority; a buy-out order is not appropriate as it would be disproportionate and go beyond remedying the specific oppression found. Because less intrusive relief was available (offering conversion to shares), and the minority did not seek or accept such a remedy, the proceeding is otherwise dismissed.
Court Disposition
Declaration made regarding oppressive conduct; proceeding otherwise dismissed; directions given regarding costs.
Orders
- Declaration that the affairs of the fifth defendant have been conducted in a manner unfairly prejudicial to, or discriminatory against, the first plaintiff under s 232 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) in relation to two share issues.
- The proceeding otherwise be dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment