Police v O'Brien [2008] NSWLC 12
Lot 152 Peakhill Road was the accused's home at the relevant time, so the breath test was administered contrary to the statutory restriction. However, the evidence may be admitted at the court's discretion under s.138 Evidence Act 1995, and given the honest belief of the police and absence of recklessness, the certificate was admitted into evidence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 June 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Trial at First Instance
- Outcome
- Breath analysis certificate admitted into evidence.
- Legal Topics
- ['pca (prescribed Concentration of Alcohol)' 'breath Analysis' 'admissibility of Evidence' 'improperly Obtained Evidence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Trial at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Was the breath test administered at the accused's home?" 'If it was, is evidence of what subsequently followed inadmissible or does the court have a discretion to admit the evidence?' 'If the court has discretion to admit or reject the evidence, how should it be exercised?']
Ratio Decidendi
Lot 152 Peakhill Road was the accused's home at the relevant time, so the breath test was administered contrary to the statutory restriction. However, the evidence may be admitted at the court's discretion under s.138 Evidence Act 1995, and given the honest belief of the police and absence of recklessness, the certificate was admitted into evidence.
Court Disposition
Breath analysis certificate admitted into evidence.
Orders
- []
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment