R v Burroughs [2019] NSWDC 327
The sentence hearing could not proceed because the offences and Form 1 matter were committed with a co-accused who had already been sentenced, the transcript of that sentence hearing was unavailable, and parity principles made it preferable that the same judicial officer determine sentence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 January 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Interlocutory Ruling on Sentence Hearing
- Outcome
- Sentence hearing adjourned to 16 May 2019.
- Legal Topics
- ['parity in Sentencing' 'sentencing of Co Offenders' 'adjournment' 'transcript of Co Accused Sentence Hearing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Interlocutory Ruling on Sentence Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the sentence hearing for Karl Burroughs could properly proceed without the transcript of the co-accused Katie Marrapodi's sentence hearing." "Whether, according to parity sentencing principle, it was preferable for the same judicial officer who sentenced the co-accused to determine Mr Burroughs' sentence."]
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence hearing could not proceed because the offences and Form 1 matter were committed with a co-accused who had already been sentenced, the transcript of that sentence hearing was unavailable, and parity principles made it preferable that the same judicial officer determine sentence.
Court Disposition
Sentence hearing adjourned to 16 May 2019.
Orders
- ['I adjourn the sentence hearing to 16 May 2019.' 'I direct transcript be obtained of the sentence hearing of the co-accused Katie Marrapodi on 4 October 2018 before Magistrate Still in proceedings numbered 2018/00113612 and 2018/00075553.' 'I direct the parties on the next occasion, if not by application...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment