Re Reference to Court of Disputed Returns; Re Webster [1975] HCA 22

Re Reference to Court of Disputed Returns; Re Webster [1975] HCA 22

There was no relevant agreement between Senator Webster personally or his company and the Public Service of the Commonwealth within the meaning of s. 44(v) of the Constitution, as any agreements arising from specific orders were casual, not continuing, and the Senator had no disqualifying pecuniary interest. Thus, he was not incapable of being chosen or sitting as a Senator.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Reference to the Court of Disputed Returns / Questions of Law on Eligibility of a Senator Referred by the Senate Under the Commonwealth Electoral Act
Outcome
Senator Webster was not incapable of being chosen or sitting as a Senator and had not become incapable of sitting as a Senator.
Legal Topics
['parliamentary Disqualification' 'pecuniary Interest and Eligibility' 'interpretation of S. 44(v) Constitution']
['constitutional Law' 'electoral Law'] ['parliamentary Disqualification' 'pecuniary Interest and Eligibility' 'interpretation of S. 44(v) Constitution']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Reference to the Court of Disputed Returns / Questions of Law on Eligibility of a Senator Referred by the Senate Under the Commonwealth Electoral Act

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether Senator Webster was incapable of being chosen or sitting as a Senator by reason of s.44(v) of the Constitution' 'Whether Senator Webster had become incapable of sitting as a Senator']

Ratio Decidendi

There was no relevant agreement between Senator Webster personally or his company and the Public Service of the Commonwealth within the meaning of s. 44(v) of the Constitution, as any agreements arising from specific orders were casual, not continuing, and the Senator had no disqualifying pecuniary interest. Thus, he was not incapable of being chosen or sitting as a Senator.

Court Disposition

Senator Webster was not incapable of being chosen or sitting as a Senator and had not become incapable of sitting as a Senator.

Orders

  • ['Questions referred to the Court of Disputed Returns answered as follows: (a) Whether Senator Webster was incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a Senator. Answer: No. (b) Whether Senator Webster had become incapable of sitting as a Senator. Answer: No.']