Re Schuppan, D.M. & Anor v. Ex parte Daly, C.T. [1985] FCA 162
The Deed of Assignment dated 19 February 1985 was not void because the procedures complied with the provisions of the Bankruptcy Act 1966. The meeting of creditors was valid, the execution of the Deed by joint debtors was permissible, and the only creditors present were joint creditors, so there was no conflict or non-compliance with statutory requirements.
- Parties
- Debtor: David Mark Schuppan; Debtor: Barbara Schuppan; Trustee: Christopher Thomas Daly
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 1985
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Application / Application for Order Regarding Validity of Deed of Assignment
- Outcome
- The Deed of Assignment is not void.
- Legal Topics
- Part X Deeds of Assignment, Validity of Deed Under Bankruptcy Act 1966
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Mark Schuppan
Debtor
Barbara Schuppan
Debtor
Christopher Thomas Daly
Trustee
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Application / Application for Order Regarding Validity of Deed of Assignment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Deed of Assignment dated 19 February 1985 executed by the joint debtors is void under Part X of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 due to the meeting of joint and several creditors being jointly called rather than separately
Ratio Decidendi
The Deed of Assignment dated 19 February 1985 was not void because the procedures complied with the provisions of the Bankruptcy Act 1966. The meeting of creditors was valid, the execution of the Deed by joint debtors was permissible, and the only creditors present were joint creditors, so there was no conflict or non-compliance with statutory requirements.
Court Disposition
The Deed of Assignment is not void.
Orders
- Declaring that Deed of Assignment dated 19 February 1985 executed by the debtors is not void.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment