Breiholdt v Green [2005] NSWSC 702
Orders giving effect to compromise among co-owners will bind absent co-owner who had notice and opportunity to be heard; substitution of deceased plaintiff's legal personal representative is appropriate upon grant of probate.
- Parties
- Plaintiff and First Cross Defendant: Hans Breiholdt; First Defendant and Second Cross Defendant: Stephen Geoffrey Green; Second Defendant and Third Cross Defendant: Mark James McClelland; Third Defendant and Cross Claimant: Deborah Caroline Bedford Vincent; Fourth Defendant and Fourth Cross Defendant: Simon Cunningham Uren; Fifth Defendant and Fifth Cross Defendant: Mark Andrew Scott; Sixth Cross Defendant: Donald Noel King; Seventh Cross Defendant: Jeanine Maree King; Substituted Plaintiff and First Cross Defendant: Nicolette Angelica Meng
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 July 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Equity / Post Hearing Judgment / Final Orders
- Outcome
- Orders made giving effect to compromise regarding distribution of proceeds of sale by trustees and costs, binding non-consenting co-owner; legal personal representative substituted as plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- Partition of Land, Statutory Trust for Sale, Distribution of Proceeds of Sale
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hans Breiholdt
Plaintiff and First Cross Defendant
Stephen Geoffrey Green
First Defendant and Second Cross Defendant
Mark James McClelland
Second Defendant and Third Cross Defendant
Deborah Caroline Bedford Vincent
Third Defendant and Cross Claimant
Simon Cunningham Uren
Fourth Defendant and Fourth Cross Defendant
Mark Andrew Scott
Fifth Defendant and Fifth Cross Defendant
Donald Noel King
Sixth Cross Defendant
Jeanine Maree King
Seventh Cross Defendant
Nicolette Angelica Meng
Substituted Plaintiff and First Cross Defendant
Procedural Posture
Equity / Post Hearing Judgment / Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether orders for distribution of sale proceeds can bind non-consenting co-owner under s 66G of Conveyancing Act 1919
- 2 Whether substitution of plaintiff due to death is appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
Orders giving effect to compromise among co-owners will bind absent co-owner who had notice and opportunity to be heard; substitution of deceased plaintiff's legal personal representative is appropriate upon grant of probate.
Court Disposition
Orders made giving effect to compromise regarding distribution of proceeds of sale by trustees and costs, binding non-consenting co-owner; legal personal representative substituted as plaintiff.
Orders
- Orders for distribution of proceeds of sale and costs as agreed by seven of eight co-owners are made, binding on the eighth co-owner, Simon Cunningham Uren.
- Nicolette Angelica Meng is substituted as plaintiff and first cross defendant in place of Hans Breiholdt.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment