In the matter of Northern Energy Corporation Limited [2023] NSWSC 126
The plaintiffs were ordered to pay the defendants' costs of the plaintiffs' motion because the significant issue was a late pleading amendment, the defendants' opposition was reasonable, the plaintiffs accepted they should pay amendment costs, the New Hope defendants had substantial success on other matters, and those other matters did not materially increase costs. The plaintiffs were also ordered to pay the New Hope defendants' costs of their motion because the New Hope defendants obtained in substance what they sought, the plaintiffs were ordered to produce documents that ought to have been produced under the earlier discovery order, and it would not be just for the New Hope...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 February 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Corporations List; Costs in Interlocutory Proceedings / Determination on the Papers of Reserved Costs of the Plaintiffs' Amended Notice of Motion Dated 2 November 2022 and the First and Second Defendants' Amended Notice of Motion Dated 1 November 2022
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs are to pay the defendants' costs on the plaintiffs' notice of motion, and the first and second defendants' costs on the first and second defendants' notice of motion.
- Legal Topics
- ['party/party Costs' 'interlocutory Applications' 'costs in the Cause' 'leave to Amend Pleadings' 'discovery' 'legal Professional Privilege Waiver' 'expert Evidence and Joint Conferences']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Corporations List; Costs in Interlocutory Proceedings / Determination on the Papers of Reserved Costs of the Plaintiffs' Amended Notice of Motion Dated 2 November 2022 and the First and Second Defendants' Amended Notice of Motion Dated 1 November 2022
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the plaintiffs should pay the defendants' costs of the plaintiffs' notice of motion, including costs of the proposed amendment and other relief sought." 'Whether the first and second defendants should receive their costs of their own notice of motion rather than have those costs be costs in the cause.' 'Whether costs in interlocutory proceedings should follow the event or be costs in the cause in the circumstances of the motions.']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiffs were ordered to pay the defendants' costs of the plaintiffs' motion because the significant issue was a late pleading amendment, the defendants' opposition was reasonable, the plaintiffs accepted they should pay amendment costs, the New Hope defendants had substantial success on other matters, and those other matters did not materially increase costs. The plaintiffs were also ordered to pay the New Hope defendants' costs of their motion because the New Hope defendants obtained in substance what they sought, the plaintiffs were ordered to produce documents that ought to have been produced under the earlier discovery order, and it would not be just for the New Hope...
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs are to pay the defendants' costs on the plaintiffs' notice of motion, and the first and second defendants' costs on the first and second defendants' notice of motion.
Orders
- ["The plaintiffs to pay the costs of the defendants on the ordinary basis of the plaintiffs' Amended Notice of Motion dated 2 November 2022, including costs thrown away as a consequence of the amendment made in the Second Further Amended Statement of claim, as agreed or taxed." "The plaintiffs to pay the costs of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment