V8 Supercars Holdings Pty Ltd v Sanpoint Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 480

V8 Supercars Holdings Pty Ltd v Sanpoint Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 480

The Calderbank offer was an effective and genuine compromise which Sanpoint unreasonably failed to accept. It addressed the whole proceedings, explained weaknesses in Sanpoint's case consistently with the Court's later reasons, and offered value of about $140,000. Sanpoint had not identified withheld material that was materially relevant to assessing the offer, and the key factual circumstances and reasoning process were sufficiently apparent when the offer was made. Accordingly Sanpoint was ordered to pay the plaintiffs' costs on the ordinary basis to 25 May 2015 and on an indemnity basis from 26 May 2015, excluding the separate-question costs dealt with by Pembroke J.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 April 2018
Procedural Posture
Costs / Costs Application Following Substantive Judgment in Which V8 Holdings Succeeded and Sanpoint's Cross Claim Was Dismissed
Outcome
Sanpoint was ordered to pay the plaintiffs' costs, except for the separate-question costs determined by Pembroke J, with ordinary basis costs to 25 May 2015 and indemnity basis costs from 26 May 2015.
Legal Topics
['party/party Costs' 'offers of Compromise' 'calderbank Offers' 'indemnity Costs' 'ordinary Basis Costs']
['civil Procedure' 'costs'] ['party/party Costs' 'offers of Compromise' 'calderbank Offers' 'indemnity Costs' 'ordinary Basis Costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Costs / Costs Application Following Substantive Judgment in Which V8 Holdings Succeeded and Sanpoint's Cross Claim Was Dismissed

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether Sanpoint should pay the plaintiffs' costs on the ordinary basis up to 25 May 2015 and on an indemnity basis from 26 May 2015 after rejecting the plaintiffs' offer of compromise and Calderbank offer." 'Whether the formal offer of compromise was a real and genuine offer of compromise so as to support indemnity costs under UCPR r 42.15.' 'Whether the Calderbank offer was a genuine offer of compromise and was unreasonably rejected by Sanpoint.' 'Whether the absence of further discovery or evidence at the time of the offers made it reasonable for Sanpoint to reject them.']

Ratio Decidendi

The Calderbank offer was an effective and genuine compromise which Sanpoint unreasonably failed to accept. It addressed the whole proceedings, explained weaknesses in Sanpoint's case consistently with the Court's later reasons, and offered value of about $140,000. Sanpoint had not identified withheld material that was materially relevant to assessing the offer, and the key factual circumstances and reasoning process were sufficiently apparent when the offer was made. Accordingly Sanpoint was ordered to pay the plaintiffs' costs on the ordinary basis to 25 May 2015 and on an indemnity basis from 26 May 2015, excluding the separate-question costs dealt with by Pembroke J.

Court Disposition

Sanpoint was ordered to pay the plaintiffs' costs, except for the separate-question costs determined by Pembroke J, with ordinary basis costs to 25 May 2015 and indemnity basis costs from 26 May 2015.

Orders

  • ["The second defendant/cross claimant is to pay the plaintiff's costs in the proceedings, save for the costs of the separate questions determined by Pembroke J in V8 Supercars Holdings Pty Ltd v Lucas Dumbrell Investments Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1391, assessed on the ordinary basis for costs incurred up to and...